<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Website Search Ranking isn&#8217;t &#8216;ALL THAT&#8217;.</title>
	<atom:link href="http://dlperry.wordpress.com/2007/07/11/search-rank-aint-all-that/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://dlperry.wordpress.com/2007/07/11/search-rank-aint-all-that/</link>
	<description>Intuitive Website Design &#124; Management &#124; Software &#124; SEO</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Apr 2009 20:57:48 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: grubgirl</title>
		<link>http://dlperry.wordpress.com/2007/07/11/search-rank-aint-all-that/#comment-22</link>
		<dc:creator>grubgirl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Jul 2007 03:14:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dlperry.wordpress.com/2007/07/11/search-rank-aint-all-that/#comment-22</guid>
		<description>Glad you like the random musings I have about food. :)

The search phrase that I think got me here was &quot;bad inbound links&quot; or something like that. I got to Lorelle&#039;s blog on WP.com, and then hopped over here.)

Yes, splogs suck and some of them are made on WP systems, so I think I&#039;m going to be letting the Google know about those guys...*evil laugh*</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Glad you like the random musings I have about food. <img src='http://s.wordpress.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>The search phrase that I think got me here was &#8220;bad inbound links&#8221; or something like that. I got to Lorelle&#8217;s blog on WP.com, and then hopped over here.)</p>
<p>Yes, splogs suck and some of them are made on WP systems, so I think I&#8217;m going to be letting the Google know about those guys&#8230;*evil laugh*</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Inbound links and Site Rank - does Google agree with ME? :-0 &#171; DLPerry.com</title>
		<link>http://dlperry.wordpress.com/2007/07/11/search-rank-aint-all-that/#comment-19</link>
		<dc:creator>Inbound links and Site Rank - does Google agree with ME? :-0 &#171; DLPerry.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Jul 2007 10:58:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dlperry.wordpress.com/2007/07/11/search-rank-aint-all-that/#comment-19</guid>
		<description>[...] Inbound links and Site Rank - does Google agree with ME?&#160;:-0 Filed under: how-to, promotion, Website Promotion, Reputation, In-Links, Search Ranking, Anti-Spam, website, Google, Adsense, marketing, Business, advertising, General &#8212; dlperry @ 4:58 am    Am I reading this wrong, or did Google just say what I&#8217;ve been thinking all along? [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Inbound links and Site Rank &#8211; does Google agree with ME?&nbsp;:-0 Filed under: how-to, promotion, Website Promotion, Reputation, In-Links, Search Ranking, Anti-Spam, website, Google, Adsense, marketing, Business, advertising, General &#8212; dlperry @ 4:58 am    Am I reading this wrong, or did Google just say what I&#8217;ve been thinking all along? [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dlperry</title>
		<link>http://dlperry.wordpress.com/2007/07/11/search-rank-aint-all-that/#comment-18</link>
		<dc:creator>dlperry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 14:19:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dlperry.wordpress.com/2007/07/11/search-rank-aint-all-that/#comment-18</guid>
		<description>Hi GrubGirl--

Thanks, Google does seem to pick up my blogs fairly quickly - they do love blogs don&#039;t they.  May I be nosy and ask what search term you used to get here?

I think you&#039;re right - it doesn&#039;t sound like yours is a Google spam issue - so a GWT Spam report wouldn&#039;t help.

Other than asking the offending linkers to &lt;em&gt;please&lt;/em&gt; knock it off, I don&#039;t really know what can be done to prevent bad in-links.  I guess one could always put a standard &quot;not responsible for...&quot; type disclaimer on the site - to at least try to negate any bad perceptions.  I just don&#039;t know how effective that is.  

It seems to me that &lt;em&gt;&#039;first impressions&#039;&lt;/em&gt; are notoriously important to us human beings - and if the first impression is a porn site, or a scam site, or a garbage laden site, etc. - I think it WILL stick in the searchers mind - consciously or not.

whew - and there I went again.  Can you tell this is a pet peeve of mine?  I just don&#039;t buy into the &lt;em&gt;&#039;...can&#039;t hurt you&#039;&lt;/em&gt; philosophy so much.  :)

ps - nice food site.  I&#039;ve bookmarked it.  I don&#039;t cook, but my hubby does &lt;em&gt;(momma didn&#039;t raise no fool)&lt;/em&gt; and he&#039;s always looking for new yummies to try and make.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi GrubGirl&#8211;</p>
<p>Thanks, Google does seem to pick up my blogs fairly quickly &#8211; they do love blogs don&#8217;t they.  May I be nosy and ask what search term you used to get here?</p>
<p>I think you&#8217;re right &#8211; it doesn&#8217;t sound like yours is a Google spam issue &#8211; so a GWT Spam report wouldn&#8217;t help.</p>
<p>Other than asking the offending linkers to <em>please</em> knock it off, I don&#8217;t really know what can be done to prevent bad in-links.  I guess one could always put a standard &#8220;not responsible for&#8230;&#8221; type disclaimer on the site &#8211; to at least try to negate any bad perceptions.  I just don&#8217;t know how effective that is.  </p>
<p>It seems to me that <em>&#8216;first impressions&#8217;</em> are notoriously important to us human beings &#8211; and if the first impression is a porn site, or a scam site, or a garbage laden site, etc. &#8211; I think it WILL stick in the searchers mind &#8211; consciously or not.</p>
<p>whew &#8211; and there I went again.  Can you tell this is a pet peeve of mine?  I just don&#8217;t buy into the <em>&#8216;&#8230;can&#8217;t hurt you&#8217;</em> philosophy so much.  <img src='http://s.wordpress.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>ps &#8211; nice food site.  I&#8217;ve bookmarked it.  I don&#8217;t cook, but my hubby does <em>(momma didn&#8217;t raise no fool)</em> and he&#8217;s always looking for new yummies to try and make.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: grubgirl</title>
		<link>http://dlperry.wordpress.com/2007/07/11/search-rank-aint-all-that/#comment-17</link>
		<dc:creator>grubgirl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Jul 2007 18:50:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dlperry.wordpress.com/2007/07/11/search-rank-aint-all-that/#comment-17</guid>
		<description>I got here from a Google search, so congrats! You write that we can only have so much control over who links to us. Just this morning I noticed 2 blog aggregator-y looking sites that didn&#039;t reference my post, but linked to it. They&#039;re not copying the whole post&#039;s content, but the site&#039;s design is a bit crappy and makes me think of a cheap SEO/ad play. Do we as blog authors have any recourse? I don&#039;t think this is spam, really, so I can&#039;t report this to Google. Thoughts?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I got here from a Google search, so congrats! You write that we can only have so much control over who links to us. Just this morning I noticed 2 blog aggregator-y looking sites that didn&#8217;t reference my post, but linked to it. They&#8217;re not copying the whole post&#8217;s content, but the site&#8217;s design is a bit crappy and makes me think of a cheap SEO/ad play. Do we as blog authors have any recourse? I don&#8217;t think this is spam, really, so I can&#8217;t report this to Google. Thoughts?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
